info@marcode.org

Want unsolicited advice? Click here to get my newsletter.

Discussion - 

0

Discussion - 

0

Do Intensive English Courses Work? What Happens on Day 4

Do Intensive English Courses Work? What Happens on Day 4 — Marcode English for Engineers podcast episode 25

An engineer emailed me before a €20 million construction project. Stakeholder meetings, negotiations, contracts, all coming at him fast. His English wasn't quite where it needed to be.

He had two options in front of him. One was a 12-week one-on-one course built around his actual project. The other was a three-day intensive somewhere quiet, small group, all meals included, €4,500.

He picked the three days.

He won't be the last. Barely a month goes by without an engineer asking me whether some three-day miracle is worth it. So: do intensive English courses work? This episode takes apart the three things engineers get sold when they want to fix their English fast — the three-day cure, the native-speaker trap, and the price-tag illusion. Then I tell you what actually works instead.

Spoiler: I have opinions.

What you'll learn in this episode

Do intensive English courses work?

Not the way they're sold. You can learn about a language in three days. You can't learn a language in three days. An intensive gives you a short spike, then a fast fade. Without spaced practice afterwards, most of it is gone within weeks.

Can you really learn a language in three days?

No. Language sticks through repetition over time, not one concentrated burst. That's memory science, not opinion. Think about how you got good at anything technical — you used the tool, hit a wall, fixed it, used it again the next Monday.

Are native English speakers better teachers?

Native-speaker status doesn't predict teaching quality. Being born into a language doesn't mean you can explain it. Around 80% of English teachers worldwide are non-native speakers. What predicts quality is pedagogy, experience, and the ability to explain why the language works the way it does.

Why are phrasal verbs a problem in technical English?

Phrasal verbs are great for the coffee kitchen and risky in a spec. "We figured out the issue" should be "we identified the issue." "The system broke down" should be "the system failed." Phrasal verbs sound casual, stay vague, and translate badly between non-native speakers. In a risk assessment, that ambiguity becomes a safety problem.

Does a more expensive English course get better results?

Price is almost completely unrelated to results. Engineers are sharp buyers everywhere else — you'd never approve a €4,500 component without reading the data sheet. But with language training, smart people fall for the price-quality heuristic and treat the price tag as a spec.

What actually works for engineers learning English?

Shorter sessions spread over weeks. Real work scenarios — your emails, your meetings, your stakeholders. Practice on live projects between sessions. A teacher who can explain why. And the one to sit with: forget fluency, aim to be understood.

Connect with Olivia Augustin

Olivia Augustin is a civil engineer and certified English as a 2nd language and Business English teacher. With her one-on-one lessons and group courses, she teaches non-native English-speaking engineers the kind of English that gets the job done.

Contact me | Get the newsletter | LinkedIn | Instagram

Olivia Augustin

Olivia Augustin is an engineer, a certified English teacher, and a lifelong language learner. She lives abroad and knows firsthand what it costs — professionally and personally — to rebuild your identity in a second (or third) language.

She founded Marcode because generic English courses don't work for engineers. So she built one that does.

Her guiding principle? Language is infrastructure. Not a personality test. As a certain Starfleet captain once said: make it so.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

My cart
Your cart is empty.

Looks like you haven't made a choice yet.